Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What kind of camera?
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:20:58 -0800
References: <27590.85831.qm@web83902.mail.sp1.yahoo.com><p06230903c93951ffabbc@[192.168.1.18]> <6B1748F12128449DA2E3AF1D0CE476CA@syneticfeba505> <3D9507B294F6425390A75050870FF876@jimnichols>

I doubt that there were Robots in general circulation.
126 is much more believable.
S.d.


On Dec 23, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:

> Hi Ted,
> 
> The same thought occurred to me, though I never had my hands on one.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <tedgrant at shaw.ca>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] What kind of camera?
> 
> 
>> Henning Wulff offered:
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] What kind of camera?
>> 
>> 
>>> Slightly smaller, and on double perforated regular 35mm film: Robot. 
>>> Most Robot models shot 24x24mm. 126 shot on 35mm film that was 
>>> perforated on one side (one hole per frame).<<
>> 
>> Hi Henning,
>> As soon as I  saw the question "ROBOT!" flashed through my mind. Played 
>> with one about 50 years ago.
>> 
>> cheers,
>> ted
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] What kind of camera?)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] What kind of camera?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] What kind of camera?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] What kind of camera?)