Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2010-12-28-22:35:40 Geoff Hopkinson: > Harrison ... Do you consider that the 90 with adapter on your G2 > gives better results than cropping the same FoV from that lens on > your M9? You are able to manage critical focus effectively? I'm far from being Harrison, but I'll jump in here anyway. I've used various Leica glass on the DMC-GF1, and my experience is that: - A micro-4/3-sized crop from a *similarly exposed*, *properly focused* M9 photo with the same lens always seems to look better than I'd get from the GF1. The M9, despite the rep CCD sensors have in some circles, is definitely lower-noise in dim light than the GF1, and in good light the pixels just seem to... look better. - The micro-4/3, on the other hand, excels at nailing exact focus (since you can focus by eye with the magnified actual pixels from the sensor). This is something I'm not always able to count on with an M and fast lenses 75mm or longer. You can also compose with SLR precision, and you get an electronic light boost when peering through the dim. And note that the currently-rare, just-coming-out DMC-GH2, while sold largely for its video capabilities, is a higher-resolution and lower-noise still camera than its predecessors. -Jeff