Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I probably do! But proprietary doesn't necessarily mean secret. Chemicals are chemicasl and anyone who knows how the developers were made might be able to whip up a batch. Not sure how it works but I don't think proprietary process can be held in perpetuity. Of course since there are fewer and fewer rolls to develop the whole thing might well be a pointless adventure. That's unless some third party started making its own version of kodachrome. Maybe the Chinese or the Indians will step up to the plate. Javier > From: jshul at comcast.net > To: lug at leica-users.org > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:30:12 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Leica] last Kodachrome > > Since the chemistry was proprietary (and required a lot of skill and manual > manipulation), probably not. You now have a new paperweight. > > Jim Shulman > Wynnewood, PA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Javier > Perez > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:13 PM > To: LUG > Subject: Re: [Leica] last Kodachrome > > > I had a roll I was meaning to get processed but forgot about. It wasn't > even > mine. It came with an old camera I bought about 10 years ago. The roll has > the older orangish end caps. After doing some research I figured it might > not take to modern development because Kodak had made some sort of change > to > the film and this can was pretty old. Does anybody know if there are any > bootleg developing efforts being planned other than black and white? > Javier > > > From: steve.barbour at gmail.com > > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:32:20 -0800 > > To: lug at leica-users.org > > Subject: Re: [Leica] last Kodachrome > > > > > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 8:15 AM, EPL wrote: > > > > > Just got my last Kodachromes back from Dwayne's today and I am again > > > reminded/floored by the quality of the rendition possible with the film > (I > > > shot mostly K25): the lovely, subtle transitions from light to shadow. > > > > > > I'll put some up on te LUG Gallery soon. > > > > yes ...please share them, > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > But I wonder: is there any way to get this kind of result with some > digital > > > magic? If someone has a trick, or some "Kodachrome-like" method they > > > can > > > share, do tell! > > > > > > Most high-end digital work still looks like plastic to me! > > > > > > Emanuel > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information