Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:55:21 -0500
References: <1AF19668-19CA-4E33-B00D-4F6C62C5AD3D@mac.com>
 
That is so unbelievably bad in so many ways.

Tina

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:26 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at 
mac.com>wrote:

> I don't think the discussion of exploiting young girls as fashion idols
> belongs with Leo's harmless photographs of aunt and niece.
>
> Though I do think Peter's cautionary reminder has great significance.
> So I've opened a new subject.
>
> <http://stocklandmartelblog.com/2011/01/17/matthias-clamers-beauties/>
>
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?)
Reply from rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: Exploitation?)