Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:21:00 -0500
References: <AD7021CB-A798-4298-AA97-58596F282D3F@mac.com> <4dcfbd1e62777f0c2e0352adcfb7fe9a.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com>

I much prefer the first one for the extra detail in the rock and snow.

Tina

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, <afirkin at afirkin.com> wrote:

> > <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=4755>
> >
> > c&c always welcome
> >
> > Regards,
> > George Lottermoser
>
> For me the "effect" shot is snappier, it looks a bit overprocessed, but
> the effect is in keeping with the subject. The softer image is less in
> keeping with the textured surfaces of rock and snow, but does look more
> "realistic". Given that the photographer 'saw' the textured image and
> wanted to display that in his creation, I have no issue with the snappier
> processing. I've used unsharp masks in the darkroom FTTT.
>
> These techniques are now so easy to use that they are being overused. It
> will "settle" down.
>
> Cheers
>
> Alastair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?)