Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Quirky digital R "solution"?
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:21:13 -0600
References: <19B3774C-31C6-4CCE-938D-9D149A34EB4E@yahoo.co.uk><4FEC6702-77F5-4149-A323-C09DD7CF4F9F@frozenlight.eu><EACD694C-C0AC-4F27-A405-16C19A07D9F0@embarqmail.com> <20110129101251.43df31b6@linux-ujdg.site>

Phil,

If you can get past the crop factor, the Olympus E-1 has a similar sensor, 
and with an appropriate adapter, can work well with Leica R lenses.  They 
can be had for less than $300.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Forrest" <photo.forrest at earthlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:12 AM
Subject: [Leica] Quirky digital R "solution"?


>I put that in the subject line to possibly gain a few more looks at the
> thread. I cheated.
> Anyways, I've been wanting a Leica R camera since before I got my first
> M2 in 2003. Once i went with the rangefinders I strayed away from using
> SLRs, eventually becoming RF-only.
>
> I've recently found that for a very few applications, the Leica RF
> bodies just can't cut it. Macro and telephoto just can't be done
> without a Viso III and a bunch of extra gear. An SLR is the most
> expedient solution.
>
> Now I want to get back into an SLR at the lowest cost of entry possible
> with the highest performance I can get. Yeah, there are plenty of D200
> and EOS 5D bodies used on the market for very cheap but I also love the
> incredible sharpness of the Leica M8 and M9 with their Kodak sensors.
>
> A few months ago, Dante opened my eyes to how good an old Kodak DCS 14n
> could be and I've been thinking that I could use the newer, slightly
> upgraded Kodak DCS SLR/n or SLR/c for my SLR needs.
>
> The Kodak SLR/n bodies are available with a whole kit as shipped from
> the factory for about $800. The RAW images that old camera produces
> rival the best that today's top end Nikon and Canon offerings can
> produce, from what I've seen.
>
> I'm thinking I can get a DCS body and a good Leica R telephoto and
> Macro lens with Leitax adapters and chips for less than the cost of
> a D700 body alone. I'd prefer a full frame camera as well having been
> spoiled by the M9.
>
> So, are any LUG'ers out there using the same system? Kodak DCS SLR or
> 14n + Leica R glass? I know about the camera's quirks and have read
> most of the negative reviews. I'm not using it for sports, so fast
> response isn't as big of a concern.
>
> Your opinions are appreciated.
>
> Thanks all,
> Phil Forrest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk (Peter Cheyne) ([Leica] IMG: My most viewed photo, and tracking online use of ones images)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: My most viewed photo, and tracking online use of ones images)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: My most viewed photo, and tracking online use of ones images)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Quirky digital R "solution"?)