Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Painted Stork
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:19:24 -0600
References: <F0E92169-474D-4E94-9E6C-5595D0B4A686@mac.com> <915045.22316.qm@web39307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <AANLkTi=h-tBC0ueFRhEKaj4JDFfwr5gviOTDvX0nBkW=@mail.gmail.com> <0A88B2DC-1D37-4CBE-94DE-C644488B3486@mac.com> <AANLkTikT6UWaK7cyeNhttOt9pnywW=k_WbRveMXeSzMN@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Jayanand.

I asked because, in my limited experience with long lenses (more in sports 
than wild life), I've always found a significant increase in quality when 
using some form of additional, mechanical stabilization; even at a 1/500th; 
and even as short as 180 mm. 

These are, of course, personal decisions; highly dependent on conditions, 
abilities and practice.

Regards,
George
(from iPad)

On Feb 7, 2011, at 20:33, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote:

> If the camera shoots perfectly acceptable photographs at ISO 6400, you can
> hand hold at 1/500 or 1/1000 on Auto ISO (you can set a minimum shutter
> speed on Auto ISO) and just play around with aperture as required - you
> actually do not even require to use VR/IS. Much easier to pan hand held as
> the 70-200 and a TC does not weigh all that much. I generally do not like
> using a tripod or monopod, and really do not photograph subjects very often
> that require their use. Normally, on safari, I use beanbags which are much
> more useful from a vehicle.


In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Painted Stork)
Message from rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Painted Stork)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Painted Stork)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Painted Stork)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Painted Stork)