Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] When did Kodachrome really die?
From: leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:53:01 -0600
References: <C979A731.A7EA%mark@rabinergroup.com> <000801cbc95b$083418f0$cd616644@youra9279112e3>

I mostly used kodachrome 200 pushed 1 stop for shooting under
flourencent/mixed lights.  Poof, no magenta / no green.

Leo Wesson
Photographer/Videographer
817.733.9157
www.leowesson.com



On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:45 PM, bill pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:
> Oh, so close but yet so far. Qualex (the name makes me giggle) was the 
> Kodak
> labs spun off into a separate company that was owned by, tuh duh, Kodak! 
> All
> the same kind of wall street crap that got us where we are today. The lab 
> in
> Kansas City was really quite good at C41 process and print. But nobody 
> could
> get the 20 points of magenta out of the Kodachrome. Hope Dwayne's had 
> better
> luck.
>
> Bill Pearce
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at 
> rabinergroup.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] When did Kodachrome really die?
>
>
>> When people switches to Velvia ?in the 80's when that stuff came out on
>> top
>> of the fact that Kodak started having some other half assed company
>> process
>> the Kodachrome. Quaaludes or Qualex or something like that?
>>
>> Velvia was great stuff just don't try making a grilled cheese sandwich out
>> of it it will stink up your whole house.
>>
>> --------------------
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> mark at rabinergroup.com
>> Cars: ? http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:40:50 -0500
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] When did Kodachrome really die?
>>>
>>> Slide boxes are in Little Washington, but my guess is that I have not
>>> shot a
>>> roll of Kodachrome in at least 30 years.
>>>
>>> It was usually to red for me.
>>>
>>> ric
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm just wondering, how long has it been since you shot the stuff, not
>>>> counting this recent "drink the kool-aid" rush.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] When did Kodachrome really die?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] When did Kodachrome really die?)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (bill pearce) ([Leica] When did Kodachrome really die?)