Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The film was commonly used buy people doing clothing catalog work and others for basic commercial work where 35mm was required. It was a sole reason for many of catalog log and fashion shooters to be owning a 35mm format camera in the first place. Many of whom would not dream of using any other film with it. Not Fuji. Not Panatomic X. not Tmax. They otherwise thought of 35mm cameras made by anybody to be toys. And plenty of those catalogs had clothing in it which was gray or white and there was no magenta cast which could not be gotten rid of. The main complainers were the landscape photographers complaining about a magenta cast you'd see in the clouds at high noon even and again that was mainly with the ASA 25 a lot of people felt it wasn't there with the 64. Before the pro version came out you'd buy a brick and it would shift in age from magenta to green so if you'd get it from a pro shop like I did you could bring the whole thing back if it was too young or too old and get a more copasetic emulsion batch. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: bill pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:45:12 -0600 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] When did Kodachrome really die? > > Oh, so close but yet so far. Qualex (the name makes me giggle) was the > Kodak > labs spun off into a separate company that was owned by, tuh duh, Kodak! > All > the same kind of wall street crap that got us where we are today. The lab > in > Kansas City was really quite good at C41 process and print. But nobody > could > get the 20 points of magenta out of the Kodachrome. Hope Dwayne's had > better > luck. > > Bill Pearce > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:31 PM > Subject: Re: [Leica] When did Kodachrome really die? > > >> When people switches to Velvia in the 80's when that stuff came out on >> top >> of the fact that Kodak started having some other half assed company >> process >> the Kodachrome. Quaaludes or Qualex or something like that? >> >> Velvia was great stuff just don't try making a grilled cheese sandwich out >> of it it will stink up your whole house. >> >> -------------------- >> Mark William Rabiner >> Photography >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >> mark at rabinergroup.com >> Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb >> >> >> >> >>> From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:40:50 -0500 >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] When did Kodachrome really die? >>> >>> Slide boxes are in Little Washington, but my guess is that I have not >>> shot a >>> roll of Kodachrome in at least 30 years. >>> >>> It was usually to red for me. >>> >>> ric >>> >>> >>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Sonny Carter wrote: >>> >>>> I'm just wondering, how long has it been since you shot the stuff, not >>>> counting this recent "drink the kool-aid" rush. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information