Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodachrome apocrypha
From: billcpearce at cox.net (bill pearce)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:29:47 -0600
References: <AANLkTi=sV=_JbEztuN+cu2fVp9uxGU8a4=qZc2NdAyB=@mail.gmail.com>

Don't know, but wouldn't surprise me,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lawrence Zeitlin" <lrzeitlin at gmail.com>
To: "Leica LUG" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:06 PM
Subject: [Leica] Kodachrome apocrypha


> It was my impression that the color balance of Kodachrome was deliberately
> altered to achieve a "pleasing" color balance. A professor of mine during
> the '50s claimed that he helped design a Kodak study where users of color
> film were asked to rank snapshots in order of preference. True color 
> photos
> were almost always rejected in favor of those that made complexions look
> "healthy", i.e. redder and slightly sunburned. Scenics were preferred 
> which
> gave the impression of a bright sunlit day. Hence the slightly magenta 
> cast
> of Kodachrome images. Does anyone know the facts of the case? Is it just a
> Rochester urban rumor?
> Larry Z
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Kodachrome apocrypha)