Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Compare: Imacon vs. Epson Scanner
From: daniel at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:28:03 +0100
References: <04BD9D2E-3EC9-4A4E-9CB2-2AD995F97683@gmail.com> <C9888EB2.AF5D%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Yeah, I wouldn't pay extra for the Imacon. I would have thought I would have 
...

I'm still using an even older model of the Epson. I probably better
pick up a new one before they disappear from the market.

Daniel

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:
> The Imacon scan at this magnification looks like the same scan as the Epson
> only with 10% more unsharp mask.
>
>
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> mark at rabinergroup.com
> Cars: ? http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>
>
>
>
>> From: Lluis Ripoll Querol <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:40:29 +0100
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: [Leica] Compare: Imacon vs Epson Scanner
>>
>> Just a test after our conversations about scanners, I suppose will be
>> interesting for all
>>
>> I've gave to my professional Lab a 6x6 negative to be scanned on their
>> Imacon Flextight 848, later I have scanned the same negative with my
>> Epson 3170, here you can compare:
>>
>> (PLEASE VIEW LARGE)
>>
>>
>> With Epson
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wEP.jpg.html
>>
>> With Imacon
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wIM.jpg.html
>>
>> A detail with Epson
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwEP.jpg.html
>>
>> A detail with Imacon
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwIM.jpg.html
>>
>> Pictures with Rolleiflex TLR, Zeiss Planar 2.8/80mm, Tri X 320 ISO
>>
>> A big difference!, in price too!. I can't afford an Imacon, but I can
>> gave them my best negatives to scann.
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
>> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
>> Blog:
>> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Compare: Imacon vs. Epson Scanner)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Compare: Imacon vs Epson Scanner)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Compare: Imacon vs. Epson Scanner)