Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Scanner comparison
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:48:56 +0100
References: <11246309.1934171299347176930.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1229> <AANLkTi=MHCPrxQcBe-DQgvDfL6twwqyaNoRfTEKrvmcP@mail.gmail.com>

Le 7 mars 11 ? 05:55, Richard Man a ?crit :

>
> Regret using film or that you no longer use film?
>
> Seems like there will be no end of discussion about which scanner is  
> "best."
> Certainly the Epson seems to hold up quite well, especially for the  
> price
> and convenience.
>

Forgot: I own thr Epson thing, with hazy glass on top now ...
Lluis sent me a pointer to cleaning stuff I should be trying

Ph


>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:
>
>> Typically the kind of scan that makes me regret film ...
>>
>> --
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all  
> previous
> replies in your msgs. ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard at sfr.fr) ([Leica] Scanner comparison)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Scanner comparison)