Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF
From: tomschofield at comcast.net (pamiesue)
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:52:26 -0700
References: <187725402.2341081299954451657.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <73CAA514-7925-45BA-8F7E-E972BDC9EC97@sfr.fr>

The "Aston-Jaguar V8"  is assembled in Germany from a VW block and heads, 
with Bosch electronics.  I wouldn't be surprised if Lucas is even re-branded 
Bosch these days.  Great deals used because of the low resale value. 
Unfortunately, you have to throw the car away when the German ZF, sealed 
"Never-needs fluid changes," transmission fails, or the German Nikasil 
cylinder coatings wear out.

I had a Bimmer once.  Bright Orange 320i.  Fast, but I didn't own it long 
enough to comment on reliability.  They don't stay right-side -up!   ;-(

I have owned two Audis in the past.  Also great deals second hand, as the 
resale value was very low -- for good reason!  There never was a time when 
everything was working.  You always have a priority list for the repairs. 
Sunroof or window not closing rises to the top in Winter.  I was in an Audi 
dealer getting parts when they had promotion for a three year lease.  I told 
the salesman that having owned two Audis, I can say that is the right length 
of time to own one.  He smiled and walked away.

Now we have a 2001 ML430 Skyview and a 94 E320 cabriolet, both with priority 
lists.  Things like the $120 cup holder the Beagle jumped on.  I am told 
that the ML gets totaled when the day comes that the skyview roof does not 
close!

Like people, they all have their issues!

Tom

-----Original Message----- 
From: philippe.amard
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 1:28 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF

My old bimmer was less reliable than my old audi - rust was the cause,
and wear too - pleasure is another question ...
ph

Le 12 mars 11 ? 19:27, grduprey at mchsi.com a ?crit :

>
> Only a Beemer from 2005 or earlier.  The new ones are time bombs,  unless 
> you do maintenance it with greater frequency than BMW calls  for.
> Cheers,
> Gene
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "H&ECummer" <cummer at netvigator.com>
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 7:04:14 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: [Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:12:20 -0600
>> From: Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Seriously OT: Jaguar XF?
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>
>> I bought my wife an XJ-6 one year.  Everyone told me not to do it.
>> They
>> were right.  I would say "suspect quality issues" is a masterful
>> understatement.
>>
>> Ken
>
> I had a Jag E type V 12 convertible when I lived in LA. I was single
> and it was the greatest crumpet collector known to man. But, it ran
> hot in the summer time and the transistor ignition seated between the
> cylinder banks melted and incapacitated the car. I suggest buying a
> beemer instead.
> Howard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 




Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF)
In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF)