Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Grotesque 2
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:48:32 -0500
References: <E06841E7-2DD0-4CF6-A998-802D865FE77B@gmail.com> <BB3CBB65-B73F-4839-89B5-E59566B349C5@mac.com> <2C55C7AD-D63C-4116-B453-0A19FBEE6359@gmail.com>
On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
> Yes..., jus a question, what is more correct in English "Shulmanesque" or
> "Shulmanistic"...? Just to add this word on our LUG dictionnary and given
> a tribute to our friend Jim,
I think either will work Lluis.
I'll continue to use "shulmanesque" on this list.
;~)
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Grotesque 2)
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Grotesque 2)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Grotesque 2)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Grotesque 2)