Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I really enjoyed going through this set. They motivate me to get off my tail and look some more. The one of the bride and groom entering the $4.95 buffet is great - though she is in for a difficult life I think. I don't know what is causing the artifacts. To me they look like severe jpg artifacts. I can really see it in the first image of the set, of the two women at the table. Maybe not scanned at high enough resolution? For b&w film I scan at 360ppi at final output size, 16-bit depth and 8X oversampling (on the Nikon scanner), and then resize and convert to jpg as needed for the web (usually jpg level 10). Ken On 3/25/2011 6:15 PM, Robert Meier wrote: > I'm going to rescan these and add some of them to the LUG Gallery. > > http://www.usfamily.net/web/robertmeier/ > > > On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:03 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > >> >> On Mar 25, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Robert Meier wrote: >> >>> But I don't understand -- they look good on my monitor, no >>> pixelation. Why would that be different on other monitors? I >>> created it in Lightroom 2. >> >> >> I don't see what I'd refer to as "pixelation." >> Though they do appear over worked (in some digital sense). >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >