Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So that's fairly accurate, since my Texas Leica yields 6x9=54 cm2 images, or just over half of yours. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog YNWA On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Richard Man wrote: > 35mm: 2,5 x3.6 = 9 square cm > XPan: 2.5x6.6 = 17 square cm > 617: 6x17 = 102 square cm > > I think I will call it the Alaska Leica :-) > > (Alaska is more than twice the size of Texas) > > -- > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous > replies in your msgs. ] > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >