Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT - need some direction about micro 4/3 cameras
From: rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:24:32 -0700
References: <4D95E632.3000207@comcast.net>

I'm enjoying my Lumix GF-1. Came with the 20/1,4 which is terrific for low 
light, but the 14-45 is what stays on the camera. 
Live view and the ability to zoom in on live view for macros is very nice 
for tripod shooting. Don't know if the Oly has that. 

I think it really boils down to in camera anti-shake vs not. If I remember 
correctly that is the primary major difference. 
Good luck. I don't think there is a bad choice here,
Bob

Bob Adler
http://www.rgaphoto.com

On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:50 AM, charcot <charcot at comcast.net> wrote:

> Olympus vs. Lumix , which bodies do people use and like.  EVF have they 
> gotten any better.  Pros and Cons.  Help I'm drowning in unhelpful 
> information so I need actual shooters to help me decide.
> 
> ernie nitka
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from charcot at comcast.net (charcot) ([Leica] OT - need some direction about micro 4/3 cameras)