Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X100
From: michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 23:52:22 +0200
References: <175F338E-5215-4329-9C43-B93BD8ED2810@me.com> <efda739b9b17181f5d76f2a4918109d0@mail.gmail.com> <B82A9639-1221-4E32-9873-A1D42FE22FB6@me.com> <003801cbf559$40b96f20$c22c4d60$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <1E06B6F3-4D14-47D1-A1E1-AF52053583DD@frozenlight.eu>

It seems that the X100 has much better high iso IQ. It's also a bit 
cheaper and smaller and doesn't need UV/IR filters. For e 3 very 
important features of the X100.
Will I buy one? Probably not, it's still digital. But I might not be 
able to resist when I have one in my hands.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema

Op 07-04-11 22:17, Nathan Wajsman schreef:
> I was thinking the same thing, except that mine is an M8--what does the 
> Fuji have that my M8 with a 35mm Summicron does not?
>
> Possibly it is more reliable...
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:23 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>
>> I turned down one in NZ, it was their second delivery but I started to 
>> think
>> when would I use it rather than the M9?
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> I was at a trade show, and I think late April/early May is what they are
>> quoting here.
>>
>> Gerry
>>
>> On 7 Apr 2011, at 15:19, Jim Shulman wrote:
>>
>>> Wish that they were in stock around here--the word I get from the
>>> local high-end camera store is "We're still waiting."
>>>
>>> Jim Shulman
>>> Wynnewood, PA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org
>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Gerry Walden
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:10 AM
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: [Leica] Fuji X100
>>>
>>> I handled the new Fuji today, and fell instantly in love. It is so
>>> like a Leica as to be easily mistaken, and the 35mm f2 lens has got to
>>> be a winner. I asked the rep how long before they had an
>>> interchangeable lens version and he said "No Comment". I then said
>>> that he wasn't denying it and he just smiled! If that was in the mix I
>> would be very tempted.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
______________________
Fokkema Fotografie
+31(0)615569576
www.michielfokkema.com



Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Fuji X100)
In reply to: Message from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Fuji X100)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Fuji X100)
Message from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Fuji X100)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Fuji X100)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Fuji X100)