Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What's the big fuss? Color vs, B&W
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:39:39 -0700

Seems like I miss the beginning of yet another discussion.

No matter, Eggleston showed us color is the new B&W.

Mundane can be art, and once it's art, it's art.

Warhol is monochromatic. In B&W? Not so much art.

Some use Leica, some use Canon, yet others use Olympus.

.... Or even a Hasselblad Flexbody with digital back

I know someone who uses 99 cents (!) lens on his Leica M9.

Some say color is best, some say only B&W is true photography.

I say, as long as there is an image out there

keep clicking that shutter.

-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


Replies: Reply from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] What's the big fuss? Color vs, B&W)