Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR V D3s
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 06:35:06 -0700
References: <C9D603D2.D950%mark@rabinergroup.com> <FF13011F-7EDC-4542-9F24-91F96ED86ED7@mac.com> <95c61925526faff8ca7d97145c5fb3d9.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com> <46E94A99-08D7-491D-BA9D-2CB157117375@gmail.com>
 
Luis.. the D3S image is a 1.6MP JPEG taken under circumstances that we have
no data on.  What lens?  Tripod?  What JPEG settings?  What camera settings?

When viewed at 1:1 on my monitor, I see no signs of noise....  It looks
pretty good to me.  In fact, I see no signs of noise or JPEG artifacting.

What do you see in THIS image that is not what you think it should be?

Is it possible that your opinion of the D3s came from other images?

I am trying to learn about noise..... and what people define as noise and
object to...

Alistair... I am very interested in your D3s v DMR results....   Using the
same conditions, only the camera body being the variable.

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


IMO the noise it is no too much noticeable and is a nice picture

cheers
Lluis


>
> http://tinyurl.com/3nr9zwq
>
> Cheers and here's luck
>
> Alastair
>
Replies: Reply from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)