Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Obviously the D3S wins at high ISO, at 100asa which background is more accurate? Top right has large variation between the two... john -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+john=chiaroscuro.co.nz at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+john=chiaroscuro.co.nz at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of afirkin at afirkin.com Sent: Sunday, 24 April 2011 8:49 p.m. To: Leica Users Group Subject: [Leica] Quick/dirty test If you have no interest in 'testing', delete now. This is a quick comparison of the DMR v D3s. First test is ISO performance. Ok I know not fair etc. First thing I will say, is that outside in daylight the differences were quite small. This series was done inside in dim artificial lighting. The images are labeled 100 to 800 then 400a and 800a. The last 2 were done using Doug's 'shoot at 200 ISO and decrease exposure technique. The series starts here and you can run forward: look at the image large to get some idea of what was found http://tinyurl.com/3dem7on Alastair