Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Puts is enthusiastic about the 4/35-70. I agree with him. I had the 28-70 and it's not worthy of the Leica name. The 3.5/35-70 is not too bad but the f4 outperforms it easily. Cheers, Michiel Fokkema On 25-4-2011 23:07, Stan Yoder wrote: > There is the Sigma-designed 28-70, the Minolta-designed f3.5 35-70, > and the Solms-designed f4 35-70. Puts is not especially enthusiastic > about any of them, though the last-mentioned above seems the least worst. > > The Solms 28-70 would be too big/heavy for me. > > What do 'yinz' (Pittsburghese for 'you all' or 'you ones') say? > > Stan Yoder > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- ----------------------- Fokkema Fotografie www.michielfokkema.com +31(0)615569576