Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I do see a lot of paper being sold as in you walk into Adorama or Calumet its the first thing you see. At B&H you go up the stairs look to your right up the platform and it goes on for a couple of hundred feet. Tons of boxes printing paper. And printing cartridges. And portfolios to put them in. I can't be the only one printing out there. And on Thursdays I hit the galleries in Chelsea and a LOT of what I'm seeing is inkjet and I'm not seeing too many iPads hanging on the walls. Just in that area there are well over a hundred galleries which feature photography most or all of the time. It is pretty much the center of the photographic art world. And the writing is on the wall with the prints. Inkjet printing is the dominant printing form in color photography. And in black and white it won't be long. People who have left their darkrooms behind have no apologies to make. And I'm one of them. Mark -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:38:49 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Hot news! There is life in film yet. > > Younger people generally don't print for two very simple reasons > > First, even a budget photo printer - which of course we know is thousand > times better and cheaper than what most amateurs can get either by doing > their darkroom prints or commercial Kodak prints in the old days - is > expensive. A Holga is $30, but they need to buy and process film, and then > may be a scanner. > > Even they use digital, the cost factor of a printer still is there. > > Second, there is no benefit for them to print. Oh, I love prints myself - > but this demographic is much happier with web pics. Yes, I know this is > your > criticism, but you know something? With the current technology, if it looks > good on the screen, and if there are enough "bits" in the file (and film is > 35mm or even medium format), then someone can make it look good coming out > an inkjet printer, so there's nothing they need to prove. > > Heck, in some Portfolio Review, a small number of people are starting to > use > their iPad to show their work. Of course they better do their research and > know that it is OK with a particular reviewer, but it's the start of a > trend. > > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> > wrote: > >> I'm not all that hung up on darkroom prints. >> I'm fine with inkjets. >> I think if they scanned their negs and had s short stack of inkjets I'd be >> real impressed with their choice of scans instead of captures and not be >> inclined to argue with them. If their photographs were good. >> Any argument on choice of tools is irreverent if both people bring prints >> to >> the table. As that's only thing which matters is the results. Not how >> they >> got there. >> >> >> Mark >> >> > > -- > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> > // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous > replies in your msgs. ] > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information