Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Pano help needed.....
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:42:59 +0200
References: <CA4CA45A.12323%mark@rabinergroup.com> <F2349B75-702E-4A18-ADF1-C41C9934949C@sfr.fr> <CAE3QcF7_rSvxO_5wpiH3b+_Se_dKxyNXSx03BU=q7V-nT94hDA@mail.gmail.com>

I agree with all who suggest using a longer lens and shooting vertically. Of 
course this means more frames to merge and hence more horsepower needed on 
the computer, but that should not be a problem in this day and age. The 
panos I have posted have usually been made with a 50mm on an M8, using 10-15 
frames to create a 180-200 degree image.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

YNWA







On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Ken I am not familiar with what tools are in Elements 8. In Photoshop there
> are a number of different merge options that you can try.
> My approach is to use a 35 and shoot vertically. On the M9 I use 30 degree
> increments for the shots to be merged.
> With Howard Cummer's cooperation, we put some discussion in the LUG Pearls
> blog here
> http://wiki.leica-users.org/index.php/Panorama_Photography
> In the example there I did 12 frames (360 degrees) and this is a crop of
> about 4 frames from that.
> 
> A couple of newer samples here.
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/133487302
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/133506658
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> 
> *Australia, paying for the world's carbon sins, one tonne at a time**.*
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 July 2011 07:02, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Pano shooting with a 21 does not make much sense to me either - just use a
>> longer lens and shoot more frames to cover what you want to show.
>> ph
>> 
>> Le 20 juil. 11 ? 21:27, Mark Rabiner a ?crit :
>> 
>> 
>>> Shot with a 21?
>>> The trick would be to shoot with a much longer lens but do more 
>>> individual
>>> shots and you'll get your full angle. Shoot verticals.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: Kenneth Frazier <kennybod at mac.com>
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:07:05 -0400
>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Subject: [Leica] Pano help needed.....
>>>> 
>>>> Folks,
>>>> 
>>>> Here's my first attempt at a pano shot, of Baltimore's inner harbor,
>>>> stitched
>>>> from three shots.
>>>> 
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/kennybod/baltimore+**
>>>> inner+harbor.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/baltimore+inner+harbor.jpg.html>
>>>> 
>>>> I need some assistance.  The photo has good detail, good color matching,
>>>> but
>>>> lots of distortion at either end.
>>>> 
>>>> I put the three shots through LR3, then stitched them in Photoshop
>>>> Elements 8.
>>>> 
>>>> Suggestions?  How to eliminate all the distortion?  Obviously I'm 
>>>> missing
>>>> something in the workflow.
>>>> 
>>>> TIA
>>>> 
>>>> Ken
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------
>>>> Kenneth Frazier
>>>> kennybod at me.com
>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from hd at hd.pp.se (Håkan Dennersten) ([Leica] unsubscribe)
Reply from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Pano help needed.....)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Pano help needed.....)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Pano help needed.....)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Pano help needed.....)