Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They kept talking about how much money it cost. I wonder who much and in modern dollars. Per shot. Or roll. -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:06:33 -0500 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodachrome NYC 1941 > > Hey - that's the year I was born. Anyway, great images, thanks for > posting. NYC then seems so...normal. My Kodachromes from the 60's and > later are still fine, except for photographic content - a million > flowers and mountains. My Ektachromes are goners. But then I guess no > problem now, the digital files will last forever, given certain > assumptions that is :). > > Ken > > > On 9/14/2011 7:25 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> Kodachrome NYC 1941 >> Taken with a Contax IIA , Carl Zeiss Sonnar F/1.5 50mm lens, a Carl Zeiss >> Sonnar F/4 135mm telephoto lens, a Photrix S.S. light meter. >> >> Charles W. Cushman Photograph Collection >> Indiana University Archives / Digital Library Program >> >> >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2036932/New-York-City-photos-Charles >> -W-Cushman-reveal-1940s-life-Big-Apple.html >> Or >> http://tinyurl.com/5t3d6b8 >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information