Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/10/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:03:20 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-HfjZf966=8PDEMYYMLWH_NHVBe-OBvZ7j-M2P-dXqO9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-GLrp2yGUKXYOykMNt0E5DJn9+XP0MR2DUu5KQvrErfxw@mail.gmail.com> <CABXy406ZFRbNvCSkipJjm5qPHchriy1Xc9P0Zgv9tzMtcVyp9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Don't talk sense. Marketing makes its own rules. More Pixels = More
Better.
Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net
Besides, most lenses don't resolve that much. So what you have more pixels
of blur? The real estate on the sensor is better used for extra sensitivity.
The direction is going towards that already.
In reply to:
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...)