Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like very much this one Mark cheers Lluis El 20/10/2011, a las 22:11, Mark Rabiner escribi?: > The 24.0-85.0 mm f/3.5-4.5 Nikkor which I used on this > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/onthisAutumnday/061020_162316z.jp > g.html > Or > http://tinyurl.com/4yn5zcg > ...And the bulk of the shots on my LUG galleries translates to > 36-127mm on > my D200 or D40x > 127mm is a big jump and a half up from 70mm. > A 127 zooms right in there. An 70 gives you a half a pop closer. > So no its not a cropped version of the ultra conservative and out > dated lens > 35-70 setup. > > Not that I'm using the 24.0-85.0 mm f/3.5-4.5 Nikkor lens full > frame I > sometimes mess its grabbing power. But the fact that 24 is really 24 > and not > 36 makes up for it. > > > -- > Mark R. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > >> From: Alex Hurst <corkflor at iol.ie> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:08:14 +0100 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: [Leica] OT Re: Report on my new 24-120/4 Nikon lens >> >> Rabs > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information