Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, If you go by the Digital Transitions booth, I think they may be using my photo: http://www.rgaphoto.com/benches/content/Bench_View_Pano_Crop_large.html Let me know if you see it!! Thanks, Bob On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>wrote: > I played with these yesterday. Or watched the guy show them too me at > Photoexpo. I'm not going today the snow is falling today the size of small > gerbils. > > https://www.schneideroptics.com/ecommerce/CatalogSubCategoryDisplay.aspx?CID > =1822 or > http://tinyurl.com/4ynsxqr > > I've never seen anything more gorgeous with this blue trim they have on it. > Schneider Kreuznach. > > Their 120 5.6 fits on your Mamiya phase 1 camera and only cost > $5,657.00. I'd have guessed 10. > > They have a 90mm 4.5 for your nikon for only $3,962.00 EA > I guess EA does not really stand for "each". > > https://www.schneideroptics.com/ecommerce/CatalogItemDetail.aspx?CID=1822&II > D=8295 > because the JSK optics which are one of the very few sources to give Leica > glass a run for their money they turn your camera, full frame or medium > format or cropped into a view camera with a large range of tilt shifts. > > And while 3 to 5 thousand dollars makes a Nikon Canon user blanch a Mamiya > user ever this is what a Leica user of today spends on his starter slow > normal lens. Chump change. > > A good way to class up my Lowly Nikon D700. I saw on on a D3. > > > A direct comparison between a Mamiya/phase1 with theses new lenses and the > S2 glass would not be direct as the guy reminds me. > Becuae as should be quite obvious we're not comparing glass. We're > comparing > whole systems. > But I have no problem with comparing whole systems. > Because when I win the lottery or start knocking off banks the system I > could get into could be Phase 1 with the blue glass. > > > -- > Mark R. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:19:34 +1000 > > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] New S lens > > > > Aah so they are identical, apart from the whole being completely > different > > thing ;-) > > > > Cheers > > Geoff > > > > *Lighting- eyes- action* > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > > > > > > On 29 October 2011 12:24, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > > > >> One is 3:2 and the other is 4:3 ratio...... > >> > >> john > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > >> > >> The sensor size is the same as the S2. In fact, I believe they are the > same > >> sensor. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Bob Adler Palo Alto, CA http://www.rgaphoto.com