Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 01:58:20 -0400

Ok I won't talk about it any more!
:)

-- 
Mark R.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Ted Grant <tedgrant at shaw.ca>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:54:56 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?
> 
> Hey folks I took a break to rest my eye and I found all this stuff! :-(
> Amazing, you guys are still playing with all this non-essential stuff
> instead of out taking the wonderful photographs you do?
> 
> Like really????? Does 1.4 compared to 1.8 make the absolute major 
> difference
> between an ICONIC PHOTO and "Hey not a bad shot?"
> 
> Get yer buns out there and just shoot great photo moments and twiddle all
> this techie meaningless stuff ! Oh I suppose there are moments of greatness
> when it does? But really?
> 
> See you all sometime in the future! The anecdotes and stories are coming
> along just fine for the new book. I thought I might drop the odd one on the
> screen as a sort of teaser? ;-)
> 
> We shall see? ;-)
> 
> Now get out and shoot! You are all wonderful photographers to be knocking
> yourselves out with this diddly 1.4 stuff!:-)
> cheers,
> Dr. ted :-)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)