Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!
From: rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:49:50 -0800 (PST)
References: <000801cca0dd$601fdfe0$205f9fa0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <82016AC7-7887-432C-B161-417FC785E445@gmail.com> <4EBDDBEE.8080105@cox.net> <19CFE570-10CF-43BA-86AA-E4C74B3C5D64@ameritech.net> <4486DCE069594B16B7722E93DDC2CB2F@syneticfeba505>

>From: "tedgrant at shaw.ca" <tedgrant at shaw.ca>

? 


>It's nothing more than... "see-shoot!"? Not a techie thought in a 
>multi-milli second! And the Great Spirit on my? 

>shoulder and trigger finger.... "CLICK!"???:-) Truth is? Heck I just got 
>lucky! :-)


"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." 



Yup.? Anyone COULD have shot that - had they put in the time, effort, money, 
training, etc.etc.so they'd know what to do and have the tools and reflexes 
and skill to do it and the willingness to do all the necessary pain in the 
butt stuff to be on the spot in the few thousandths of a second when the 
opportunity arose 


And yet.? There you are - the only one who DID shoot it.? On the spot with 
the tools and the reflexes. F8 and BE THERE.


Talking about whether someone else could have done it?? Sod that.  If anyone 
could have shot it, there'd be other versions. If pigs had wings, they'd be 
pigeons.

There's a lot more to this than most folk realize.



And then there's THIS shot, this 7-figures-worth-of-WTeverlovingF?!? print, 
which from what I can tell has no redeeming value whatsobloodyEVER...
The only saving grace is that I never expected that stuff to make sense; 
it's all marketing, and these days the only use I get out of the marketing 
classes I was required to take is that I know what to ignore....


?
R. Clayton McKee
PhotoJournalist
from somewhere just south of somewhere else...


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from disfromage at ameritech.net (Richard Wasserman) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)