Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] HUMOUR :-) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:13:48 -0600
References: <000801cca0dd$601fdfe0$205f9fa0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <82016AC7-7887-432C-B161-417FC785E445@gmail.com> <4EBDDBEE.8080105@cox.net> <19CFE570-10CF-43BA-86AA-E4C74B3C5D64@ameritech.net> <4EBE9D4D.4070002@cox.net> <CAE3QcF7Yh697tAjHJPwz8DN176YR21Kie2w7d3dDAVbe093jPQ@mail.gmail.com> <9836D11F-2536-4C8B-8B71-BF14725B079A@embarqmail.com> <D783D5F63E214D75B7FB94E57316A5AF@syneticfeba505>

I always meant to look up "fine art" photography.  Is there an "average 
art" or a "bad art"?  There must be only one category since that's all I 
ever see.  Now that I think of it, what causes a photo to cross over the 
line into "art"?  Just wondering.  If I knew I could add that to my new 
LUG tools of print 8' wide and only editions of six.

Ken
Who had his tail roasted by a painter when he referred to a photograph 
as art, although even there I never received an explanation, although 
the lady agreed there were other forms of art, such as sculpture.  I 
thought it best not to get into other fringe areas such as covering 
buildings in Saran wrap.


On 11/12/2011 4:57 PM, tedgrant at shaw.ca wrote:
> Hi Crew,
> In my hundreds of pages of saved anecdotes and humours photo notes I 
> just came across this one and thought it rather fitting regarding the 
> topic! :-)
> =================
>
> Photographer as artist!
>
> ==================
>
> An art photographer asked the gallery owner if there had been any 
> interest
>
> in his photographs on display at that time. "I have good news and bad
>
> news," the owner replied.
>
>
>
> "The good news is that a gentleman inquired about your work and 
> wondered if
>
> it would appreciate in value after your death."
>
>
>
> "When I told him it would, he bought all 15 of your photographs."
>
>
>
> "That's wonderful," the artist exclaimed.
>
>
>
> "What's the bad news?"
>
>
>
> "The guy was your doctor..."
>
> ======================
>
>
>
> Well OK eh? It's Saturday afternoon com'on crew, smile or laugh! :-) 
> OK OK kinda sick hunour, so big deal! Get over it! If you have a 
> problem go pour a fine single malt, sit back then laugh! :-) :-)
>
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Dr. ted  :-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] HUMOUR :-) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] HUMOUR :-) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman! - fine art)
In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from disfromage at ameritech.net (Richard Wasserman) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] HUMOUR :-) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)