Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: lens shutters suck
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:57:21 -0800
References: <80734B3E-B2A7-4B6A-B736-2CB611D8F3F9@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-EGJMscfkhF32+wT=i3V8E_ft0o2UhGg9Mwg1RhE2PG6w@mail.gmail.com> <708ACBAB-AE95-448E-8CDB-89D7B5A0A7BE@frozenlight.eu>

Doesn't a Pentax 6x7 weighs twice as much as the Fuji 6x9? Totally
different kind of beast?

May be one of those older 6x6 /6x7 folders? They are pretty cheap too.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
frozenlight.eu>wrote:

> It does entice me, but getting this kind of stuff back from the lab sucks.
> I think I will go for a Pentax 6x7 which is probably more reliable.
>
> Cheers,
> nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>
> > Take a look at that large 6x9 negative.
> >
> > It will take quite a bit of work to beat that even with a Leica M9,
> unless
> > you are doing the Paul thing.
> >
> > Worth it? Only you can decide. I probably won't shoot with my -4T or M7
> > much ever again, but I am shooting more XPan than ever before. So if the
> > 6x9 neg entices you...
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Just got back 3 rolls of MF film from the lab in Barcelona, shot with my
> >> Fuji 6x9. Of the 24 pictures in total, 14 are blank frames. And no, I
> did
> >> not accidentally photograph the inside of my camera bag this many times,
> >> since I follow the standard Leica RF practice of not advancing the film
> >> before putting the camera in the bag. I guess the lens shutter is
> sticking,
> >> i.e. not opening about half the time. Given that I only paid $300 for
> this
> >> camera, the fact that it has turned into a paperweight is annoying but
> not
> >> devastating. But it does mean that I am on the lookout for a reliable
> 6x7
> >> or 6x9 MF outfit.
> >>
> >> Or I should just stop this film foolishness and get on with life in the
> >> 21st century.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Nathan
> >>
> >> Nathan Wajsman
> >> Alicante, Spain
> >> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> >> http://www.greatpix.eu
> >> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> >> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> YNWA
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)