Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] "On The Cover Of The Rolling Stone"
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:00:25 -0600
References: <CAAsXt4PaYXU-16oK7WC+qTspOQKsVUsinBpCR5x6rC26fggZPA@mail.gmail.com> <8823BE94-70BA-49BE-9EF8-E170C6439F18@mac.com> <CAAsXt4O43uV1U46t6+96Lm-zzc5Q17CdeSD1Mq=sqRkxGRBQqg@mail.gmail.com>
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
> That was corrected in the print. I'll change my website this weekend;
> hadn't noticed it.
do you attribute it to
the sensor?
or
the lens?
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] "On The Cover Of The Rolling Stone")
In reply to:
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] "On The Cover Of The Rolling Stone")
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] "On The Cover Of The Rolling Stone")
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] "On The Cover Of The Rolling Stone")