Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PESO: Cosmetic differences
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:50:26 +0100
References: <e2e33bb15e8c3ad3715217080f7eef2c@mail.gmail.com> <A2E96FDB-4C45-41D1-BD69-70FBDC62AAE4@usjet.net>
 
Great viewing Jim

A connaisseur ;-)
Ph




Le 25 nov. 11 ? 15:37, Robert Meier a ?crit :

> Brilliant.
>
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 7:28 AM, Jim Shulman wrote:
>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/focusit/cosmetic+differences+sm.jpg.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Leica M2, DR Summicron, Neopan 100
>>
>>
>>
>> Jim Shulman
>>
>> Wynnewood, PA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Cosmetic differences)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] PESO: Cosmetic differences)