Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LINK Re: 25 mm PannyLeica Summilux - A Few Test Pix
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:27:31 -0500
References: <D8290474-A0B2-4EB6-ADA9-AB34422B70E6@comcast.net> <E76042AB64F648EFA1C07A0EAD646F6B@qck8vqhgou8blu> <83A94312-20D3-40BF-9376-9D514FD221A3@sfr.fr>

Here's the link.

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rtaylor/PICKS/25mm_summilux/

Regards, 

Dick



On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:13 PM, philippe.amard wrote:

> My! You snipped the link and I can't see what it is all about :-(
> 
> ph
> 
> 
> Le 28 nov. 11 ? 17:09, A. Lal a ?crit :
> 
>> 
>> DOes anyone know how much optical correction is done in camera by 
>> firmware in the MFT system?
>> 
>> I assume the Panasonic body 'knows' that  a 25mm Summilux is mounted and 
>> in order to enhance the captured image  will do some data manipulation, 
>> even in RAW mode, before writing to the memory card. How would this 
>> affect overall image quality if the lens is used on, say, an Olympus MFT 
>> body where the camera may not 'know' that a Summilux is mounted?
>> 
>> Also are any MFT users using adapted four-thirds lenses on their MFT 
>> bodies? If so  please comment on AF speed and compatibility. Olympus made 
>> a very tempting 50 macro for the original FT system that has no direct 
>> equivalent in the MFT system.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Akhil
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Taylor" <r.s.taylor at 
>> comcast.net>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 4:58 PM
>> Subject: [Leica] 25 mm PannyLeica Summilux - A Few Test Pix
>> 
>> 
>>> Hello again.  I got one of the few 25mm Panasonic Summilux lenses B&H had
>>> in stock last week and thought you might like to take a look at what it
>>> can do.  Most of these are a full resolution so you'll be able to pixel
>>> peep around the frame as much as you like.
>>> 
>> SNIP
>>> The lens sure looks good to me.  It is sharp, contrasty, and has a least 
>>> a
>>> bit of that "Leica  look" about it.  There is some softness at the 
>>> corners
>>> but how much of that is due to curvature of the field I can't tell.  The
>>> overall sharpness is excellent.  The only problem I noted was an
>>> occasional inability of the lens to focus close in in some circumstances.
>>> I'm not sure what was going on with that.  It may be operator error.
>>> 
>>> It's a keeper, in any case.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Dick
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] LINK Re: 25 mm PannyLeica Summilux - A Few Test Pix)
In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] 25 mm PannyLeica Summilux - A Few Test Pix)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] 25 mm PannyLeica Summilux - A Few Test Pix)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] 25 mm PannyLeica Summilux - A Few Test Pix)