Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Possibly (hopefully) they are Richard, but I think that Adobe improves the 'translation' of native RAW files as time goes on. Maybe I am wrong, and someone will put me right on this. Gerry Gerry Walden LRPS +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) Web: www.gwpics.com On 10 Jan 2012, at 07:08, Richard Man wrote: > You sure it's not just that your skills are better now than in 2006? > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at me.com> wrote: > >> I am working on older images (2006) in Lightroom, and I am finding that >> they are a lot better than when I worked on them back then. They are .raf >> files from a Fuji S2, and I think they have been improved as Adobe has >> updated the way it reads the files. >> >> Now for the question - if files are converted to .dng files is that >> conversion then 'set in stone' or is the conversion updated as Adobe >> improves its translation of the files? >> >> Thanks, as I am sure someone here knows the answer. >> >> Gerry >> >> Gerry Walden LRPS >> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >> Web: www.gwpics.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information