Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Same with LR, hence I am a bit confused by Gerry's questions :-) On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Chris Crawford < chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> wrote: > I wonder of us CS5 users will get an update to that 2012 profile? Hope so! > In Photoshop you can actually switch back and forth between the profiles. > There's a pull-down menu buried deep in the Camera Raw controls that > allows you to choose. So, updating to a newer one does not take away the > ability to use the old one if you need it for something. > > -- > Chris Crawford > Fine Art Photography > Fort Wayne, Indiana > 260-437-8990 > > http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio > > http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! > > http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 > Become a fan on Facebook > > > > On 1/10/12 3:22 AM, "Gerry Walden" <gwpics at me.com> wrote: > > >I had forgotten that you can upgrade the camera calibration profile in > >LR, and I notice in the new LR4 Beta there is now a 2012 profile, which > >seems to answer my question. Thanks Chris! > > > >Gerry > > > >Gerry Walden LRPS > >+44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) > >+44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) > >Web: www.gwpics.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On 10 Jan 2012, at 08:19, Chris Crawford wrote: > > > >> Don't know about Lightroom, but in Photoshop CS5, the raw converter > >>allows > >> you to choose between the 2010 profile or the 2003 profile! So you could > >> still open stuff with the old profile system in later versions of > >> Photoshop. > >> > >> -- > >> Chris Crawford > >> Fine Art Photography > >> Fort Wayne, Indiana > >> 260-437-8990 > >> > >> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio > >> > >> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! > >> > >> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 > >> Become a fan on Facebook > >> > >> > >> > >> On 1/10/12 2:35 AM, "Gerry Walden" <gwpics at me.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Richard > >>> > >>> That is my point. They upgrade to a new 2010 profile, but if a .dng > >>> conversion was done way back then there a similar upgrade to a new .dng > >>> version or is it stuck at the old level/values? > >>> > >>> Gerry > >>> > >>> Gerry Walden LRPS > >>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) > >>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) > >>> Web: www.gwpics.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 10 Jan 2012, at 07:32, Richard Man wrote: > >>> > >>>> The preset may be different, and may be it's set up to be (for > >>>>example) > >>>> more contrast to begin. > >>>> > >>>> "Camera Calibration" would also definitely make a difference. The > >>>>latest > >>>> "2010" Process probably looks better than the "2003" Process, and the > >>>> "Adobe Standard" profile is probably better than the "Embedded" > >>>>profile. > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at me.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Possibly (hopefully) they are Richard, but I think that Adobe > >>>>>improves > >>>>> the > >>>>> 'translation' of native RAW files as time goes on. Maybe I am wrong, > >>>>> and > >>>>> someone will put me right on this. > >>>>> > >>>>> Gerry > >>>>> > >>>>> Gerry Walden LRPS > >>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) > >>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) > >>>>> Web: www.gwpics.com > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 10 Jan 2012, at 07:08, Richard Man wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> You sure it's not just that your skills are better now than in 2006? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at me.com> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I am working on older images (2006) in Lightroom, and I am finding > >>>>>>> that > >>>>>>> they are a lot better than when I worked on them back then. They > >>>>>>>are > >>>>> .raf > >>>>>>> files from a Fuji S2, and I think they have been improved as Adobe > >>>>>>> has > >>>>>>> updated the way it reads the files. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now for the question - if files are converted to .dng files is that > >>>>>>> conversion then 'set in stone' or is the conversion updated as > >>>>>>>Adobe > >>>>>>> improves its translation of the files? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, as I am sure someone here knows the answer. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Gerry > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Gerry Walden LRPS > >>>>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) > >>>>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) > >>>>>>> Web: www.gwpics.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >>>>>>>information > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > information > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Leica Users Group. > >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>