Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not according to the scans I made with the LS-9000 scanner. It's definitely not better than my Tri-X and actually ... worse. Of course I am getting pretty good data off the Tri-X negs using the 2-bath Pyrocat... On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote: > Yes, it demands full exposure, but it has incredible resolution. > > Herb > > > I don't think I ever bought any, but I have about half a dozen rolls of >> XP2 >> in the fridge. I got them from trades and used gear purchases etc. >> >> I never used them but I just tried one over the weekend. >> >> It's nice but it's no Tri-X :-) >> >> So if anyone wants them, you can have them for the price of shipping. >> Please contact me off list. >> >> -- >> // richard >> <http://www.richardmanphoto.**com<http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >> > >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > -- > Herbert Kanner > kanner at acm.org > 650-326-8204 > > Question authority and the authorities will question you. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>