Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: A Couple of Film Images
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:29:25 -0600
References: <E88D0B666F1D426C8966D32A12530BA5@jimnichols> <E5C5D141-6B48-4CCA-B465-D38F03C4A7B0@frozenlight.eu> <A1E449D3929D4016A54F569D95E0FEC2@jimnichols>

I've never been happy with scans from our Walgreen's.  If you process and
print, the stuff looks great, and that is a great mystery, because they use
the same scans to print.

I've even scanned the prints on a flatbed, and they looked better than the
Walgreen's scans.


I've had them process only, and then scanned the images myself, and the
results were fine.


On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at 
lighttube.net>wrote:

> Nathan,
>
> After some discussions with Moose and Ken N., I think the problem may be
> with lab practices.  When I get a chance, I will shoot a second roll and
> take it to a local private lab.  I hope that turns out better.  For what
> its worth, the negatives themselves look ok.  It may well be in their
> scanner technique.
>
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at 
> frozenlight.eu>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: A Couple of Film Images
>
>
>
>  Sorry Jim, but if these results are really what the film delivers, and
>> are not the result of overenthusiastic sharpening in the digital stage,
>> then you should bit the bullet and throw away the remaining rolls. Your
>> pictures deserve better.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: 
>> http://nathansmusings.**wordpress.com/<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>
>>
>> YNWA
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>
>>  In searching for film available locally, I found a 4-roll pack of Kodak
>>> Ultramax 400, so I gave it a try.  To me, except in bright light, the 
>>> noise
>>> level is objectionable, but I plan to use it up anyway.
>>>
>>> My film is processed at Walgreen's,  as seen here through the windshield:
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/OldNick/Walgreen+12a.**jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Walgreen+12a.jpg.html>
>>>
>>> My airport friends began to "ham it up" when they saw my camera pointed
>>> their way:
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/OldNick/Airport+Friends.**jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Airport+Friends.jpg.html>
>>>
>>> Bessa R2a with Canon 50/1.4, Kodak Ultramax 400, with a little help from
>>> Neat Image
>>>
>>> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>>>
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See 
>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>  more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana

USA


Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: A Couple of Film Images)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: A Couple of Film Images)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: A Couple of Film Images)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: A Couple of Film Images)