Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Controversial?
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:05:37 +0530
References: <0D49E68B-9AA6-46B9-BF31-BC4B34A99E86@sfr.fr> <EF9865DE7D6444778CB5986F5C11F68E@jimnichols>

Like all "Best of" lists it is subjective. I have right now nos.
9,11,15,17,29,33 and have owned and used a sprinkling of others, and as Jim
says still more first cousins...and I am planning to get no 50 as soon as
it is available here.
Cheers
Jayanand


On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at 
lighttube.net>wrote:

> Could be.  I've owned #1, #13, $ #15 plus close cousins to a few others.
> The SX-70 was great for a short while, but I gave up on it when the
> compression rollers would not distribute the fluid uniformly.  It is still
> about six feet away, in a closet.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard at 
> sfr.fr
> >
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:48 PM
> Subject: [Leica] OT: Controversial?
>
>
>
>  Might be ...
>> http://www.photographymonthly.**com/Magazine/2010/50-Greatest-**
>> Cameras-of-All-Time<http://www.photographymonthly.com/Magazine/2010/50-Greatest-Cameras-of-All-Time>
>>
>> Bien cordialement de Metz
>> Philippe
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>


In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)