Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] thoughts ?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:49:37 -0800
References: <408CF038-05D4-4FC0-B9CE-5370D40EF08C@gmail.com> <45337D29-45F4-47F7-ABC5-F1D30A5F27BD@mac.com> <E67C964A-8786-44C0-9B37-D24754FD398C@gmail.com> <CA+FSgq4HvNTscE6_8umxr1xsSJMp0o9x+w=RYskQj=zn_ABWHA@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Jacky aus wrote:

> I agree with George B&W or Colour delivering different thoughts and feel
> for the subject as well as what the photographer wishes to communicate.
> 
> 
> 
> In this particular shot, I would prefer the B&W though the colour one gives
> us more details and information about the subject matters.
> 
> 
> 
> Photography is an art. How to look and feel for a subject is also an art.
> No absolute and perfect answer. Down to the bottom, art is quite subjective
> and personal for the one devoted into world of arts.
> 
> 
> 
> I think the photo does remind me how we look into our own life span and
> stage, because, if we could live up to that old and lead the similar kind
> of life, could we still enjoy it as a blessing.
> 
> 
> 
> Steve, thank and appreciate your skill and great effort for the good
> snapshot of life reality.


thanks Jacky,

Steve


> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> Jacky.
> 
> 
> On 14 February 2012 09:00, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 1:49 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>> 
>>>> first this
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW2012/struggling.jpg.html
>>>> 
>>>> now this
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW2012/color.jpg.html
>>>> 
>>>> I do ask please your input as to which of the two you find most
>> effective, which you prefer (that may be different) and why that is ?
>>> 
>>> Every photographer needs to (at least occasionally) ask,
>>> "What am I trying to say with this photograph?"
>>> 
>>> most effective?
>>> to communicate what point (or points)?
>>> 
>>> For me:
>>> 
>>> Color photographs (when well done with decent equipment) appear "hyper
>> real" to my eye.
>>> Reality amplified and further enhanced by freezing a moment for detailed
>> study of COLOR, line, form and content.
>>> More real than reality.
>>> 
>>> Black and white photographs (when well done with decent equipment)
>> "suggest reality" to my eye.
>>> Reality subdued yet also enhanced by freezing a moment for detailed
>> study of texture, line, form and content.
>>> More metaphoric than reality.
>>> 
>>> Between these two (for the purpose of this discussion) extremes
>>> we could easily examine the effect of muting, in steps, the colors to
>> soften a "harsh" reality.
>>> 
>>> Yet we're still left with the question,
>>> "What does the photographer wish to communicate?"
>>> A harshly real environmental, candid portrait?
>>> A metaphorically real environmental, candid portrait?
>>> Or something in between?
>>> 
>>> A final decision, for me would depend on the "use" context.
>>> We're looking at these two photographic possibilities out of context on
>> our computer screens.
>>> We're looking at them surrounded by emails, our other work, within our
>> homes or offices.
>>> Some of us, like Sonny, see them within a context "very close to home" -
>> living with a similar actual reality.
>>> Others of us see them in the context of memories of friends or love ones
>> who've moved on.
>>> "Choosing" one or the other (or an unseen in between version) would, for
>> me, require knowledge of the book or article which may surround them.
>>> Each treatment provokes a different reaction.
>>> Each viewer will have a different reaction to each treatment.
>>> 
>>> One thing's for sure.
>>> With each passing year we're all headed toward "this state of being" one
>> way or another.
>>> I see no lack of dignity in either version.
>>> We all eat; and need cleaning up.
>> 
>> 
>> very well thought through, thanks George,
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george at imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] thoughts ?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] thoughts ?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] thoughts ?)
Message from jackyaus at gmail.com (Jacky aus) ([Leica] thoughts ?)