Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The smallest M lens
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:47:06 -0800
References: <CAF8hL-EFb=wW39vQ0iaQ8nHKdbu2vg3OZe8PnxJTn5K2zB20-w@mail.gmail.com> <35A2C1D6-81BF-413B-BFA1-D107FE6C9B3D@archiphoto.com> <CAF8hL-ENPzKQwpO2=hdW23iBonLn-NVhaEPRGPN5eq5RdGB29w@mail.gmail.com>

BTW, my work in progress Chinatown portfolio
http://richardmanphoto.com/Portfolio/Chinatown_web.pdf

3, 10, 11, 12, and 19 are from the Perar 35

4, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 are 50'lux ASPH, 35'lux ASPH and ZM 25/2.8

The rest are XPan

The lens are slower and are more fiddly to use, especially the Pera 35.

But even when printed, the Perar hold up quite well. Optical performance
wise, I bet they are equal or better than the Leica lens of the old, since
they use modern glass types.
-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The smallest M lens)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] The smallest M lens)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The smallest M lens)