Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:00:53 -0800
References: <3B5300DC8B914F49B9F6EF0A8F392D7E@jimnichols> <28B37608-01EC-4158-BABC-9B184DCA0947@usjet.net>

But the one without fill should have a little more on the top...

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> 
wrote:

> Without the flash is infinitely better.
>
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>
> > The Croci were in very poor light.  Here is a shot without the fill
> flash.  Perhaps, after all, it is the better image, though highlights from
> the sun are blown in both of the images.
> >
> > Original, with fill flash:
> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus85.jpg.html
> >
> > Without fill flash:
> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus82.jpg.html
> >
> > Comments and critiques welcomed.
> >
> > Jim Nichols
> > Tullahoma, TN USA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash)