Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Very very nice. What software did you use to make the conversion? My experiences with M digital bodies and later-coded lenses has been like yours, to the point where I just threw up my hands and sold most of my older lenses including the Noct. I now have a bag mostly full of new but (relatively) low cost Summarits and am (relatively) as happy as I can be. --Bob p.s. Does your dealer possibly happen to have two names that begin with a K and an S? ==On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: > >From my front yard. My mother-in-law's yartsite (marking of the day > someone > died) was four years ago today. Her name was Lillian. Unfortunately she > hated lilies, but she presented me with this today. > > http://www.rgaphoto.com/fleur/content/L1000384-Edit-Edit_large.html > > This was taken with the noctilux. As you can see, the front of the flower > (where I focused) is out of focus. When I bought the lens and the M9, the > dealer sent the nocti in for coding and CLA. I asked the dealer's salesman > to please send my new M in with the lens so that they could be matched. He > insisted it wasn't necessary because if my new M was checked at the factory > before shipping, it would perfectly match the M they were going to test the > Nocti on. Twice I insisted; twice he said it wasn't necessary. He checked > it before shipping it to me (after it was in NJ for 6 weeks) and said it > was perfect. > > Obviously it's not. He is sending me a loaner M and 50 summicron while he > sends my M and Nocti, again, to NJ. Also giving me attitude unfortunately. > Oh well. Hopefully it will return in 6 weeks and with a happy ending... > > -- > Bob Adler > Redwood City, CA > http://www.rgaphoto.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >