Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M10 May 10
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:48:21 +1300
References: <CB8AE3A5.1BC27%mark@rabinergroup.com> <B624E70E-F2A7-42BF-89BD-817963E94E8F@mac.com> <CAFfkXxvQPTOGkFKN6ACtLSucWq2b1FOme3V8Ose5-yqu07w19A@mail.gmail.com> <B1A6A2B5-4B6D-4BD1-95A9-17DEDB86BE46@frozenlight.eu>

I have probably had more comments about my chrome X100 than my black M9!

john

-----Original Message-----

Yes, and it has happened to me with the X100 as well. I think it's because
both the Leicas and the Fuji look really old-fashioned, so people get
curious.


>> 
>>> The M9 is not a medium format digital camera.
>>> Its a 35mm digital format camera and need to stand up with those guys.
>> 
>> YAH! Be more like them!
>> Give up that which is unique!
>> and Sets you apart!
>> 
> 
> 
> Have you ever had someone stop you and ask to see your Nikon, Canon or 
> Pentax DSLR?
> 
> I haven't, though I have carried all of the above at one time or another..
> 
> But it happened two times this week in Natchitoches with my M9.




In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M10 May 10)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M10 May 10)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] M10 May 10)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M10 May 10)