Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] A new M9 comparison
From: hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:10:25 -0400
References: <89951DB1-4B6F-4EDB-853F-2D7500599252@bex.net> <CB994F92.1C3ED%mark@rabinergroup.com> <003501cd0d5c$db754360$925fca20$@chiaroscuro.co.nz>
 
Correct. This particular exercise isn't about comparing the M9 to any other 
camera. What concerns me is whether there is a problem with my camera or my 
lens or the person holding them. Or no problem at all.

?howard

On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:34 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> This is a Northern hemisphere M9 vs a Southern hemisphere M9 ;-)
> 
> The original thread was that Howards 90AA shot was not of the standard
> people expected of Leica. I would say that it is still lacking in fine
> detail from what I would I thought the 90AA can do.......
> 
> john
>
In reply to: Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] A new M9 comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] A new M9 comparison)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] A new M9 comparison)