Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:22 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > I attacked the Fuji X Pro or not being on par with an M. > That a cheap plastic compact plastic point and shoot Except that the x-Pro 1 has a cast aluminum alloy with, by all reports of those who've actually handled it, exceptional fit and finish. A $1,700 body doesn't = cheap in my world. The x-Pro 1 sports a cutting edge X-Trans CMOS sensor technology which, allegedly, provides greater resolution and fine detail than other CMOS sensors (as it does away with an optical low pass filter). I simply do not understand "attacking" a tool which one has not handled, tested in the field, or possibly even laid eyes on. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist