Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Getting what you pay for, Leica vs Zeiss, etc
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:45:03 -0400
References: <201203311032515.SM43145@CSHORE-MAIL2>

Are you examining the files at 100%?  How can you ignore the awful
chromatic aberration with Canon lenses?  I could never get around that.
 Every file I have that was made with a Canon lens, especially the wide
ones, has such awful chromatic aberration on the edges and corners that it
takes me hours to correct it.  I don't use Canon unless I absolutely have
to and I have the 5D and 1DMII.

Tina

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:32 AM, dnygr <dnygr at cshore.com> wrote:

> This message was originally HTML formatted.  View in a HTML capable client
> to see the original version.\r\n\r\nThis post concerns the discussion about
> Leica vs Zeiss, German vs Japanese.
>
> Disclosure: I am a dedicated Leica uses. I use it 98% of the time. I love
> the quality of Leica glass.
>
> I do a lot of photography in poor light. Here is where I start to have a
> problem with Leica. Not with the lenses.
> The problem is not the quality of the lenses. They perform well.
>
> It's the Leica sensor. I find the colors are a problem. They are off. I
> used a Canon 5D I found its color in those situations
> to be better. I still prefer the Leica however. The size of the Canon
> annoys me. The large "L" pro lenses annoy me.
>
> A friend suggested I use the simple 2.0 Canon lens. Compared to the L and
> Leica lenses it was a cheap purpose. The thing works
> darn well. It isn't bulky and the colors in the dark remain good.
>
> I may try using Aperture instead of Photoshop with the Leica. That may
> solve some of the color problems.
>
> But having shot with the Canon, I feel I got a lot for my money with the
> 35 and still have a lot of change in my pocket.
> I feel the Leica is less bulky to use. I don't like the mirror delay of
> the Canon. I like Leica lens quality--the three dimensionality.
> The Canon however gives me more than I would suspect I'd get for $300.
>
> Cheers--Doug
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (dnygr) ([Leica] Getting what you pay for, Leica vs Zeiss, etc)