Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Apr 04, 2012 at 12:11 AM -0400, Mark Rabiner wrote: >It ain't broke. So I don't think somebody's going to fix it. The output is >gorgeous. Nobodies looking at the images going "gee that sure would look >better if it was shot with a monochrome sensor". "Mark doesn't think it's broke. And since everyone must have the same needs and opinions as Mark, there is no need for this camera." We get it, you don't have a need for a monochrome camera. Heck, even though we've explained the advantages of them several times, I don't think you get them yet. But then again, most people don't know the potential advantages, nor do they need a monochrome camera. So why not just leave it at that? If someone wants to plunk down their hard earned money on a monochrome sensor, or an overpriced Leica lens, or a Lotus Elise, or a buggy whip, or any number of things that people spend their money on, what difference does it make to you?