Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Red Dot Forum - ISO Test: Leica MM
From: lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:55:13 -0400
References: <CAOfQYBvjBn0rLpPx476o+NH=NKEpb6hF1ZyVEnA6LZfWSMiACw@mail.gmail.com>

I wish some of these tests were conducted with something other than the new
whiz-bang 50/2.0. If I use a 50mm once in 3 years, that'd be a lot for me.
I assume most of us use a small spectrum of focal lengths, which won't even
be available in steroidal, bank breaking versions in the near future. More
useful (for me, anyway) would be one (or both) of the current (or even
classic) 1.4's: 35 & 50mm. The M9 vs Mono race might be more of a dead heat
if ordinary Leica glass is used.

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Phil Swango <pswango at att.net> wrote:

> Red Dot Forum - ISO Test: Leica M Monochrom vs. Leica M9 -
>
> http://www.reddotforum.com/content.php/231-ISO-Test-Leica-M-Monochrom-vs.-Leica-M9
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
-Lew S.


Replies: Reply from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Red Dot Forum - ISO Test: Leica MM)
In reply to: Message from pswango at att.net (Phil Swango) ([Leica] Red Dot Forum - ISO Test: Leica MM)